The following item is essential reading for prostate cancer victims and for those suffering from benign prostate enlargement.

Whatever therapy is preferred, conventional or alternative medicine, it is, I believe, essential to have have an in-depth understanding of the benefits or disadvantages of each before one can weigh up the pro’s and con’s for YOU personally.

Visit us online at: MedPageToday

The Year in Prostate Cancer

By Judith Groch, MedPage Today Staff Writer
December 26, 2006

MedPage Today Action Points

Review
ATLANTA, Dec. 26 — The long-running debate about treatment choices for early localized prostate cancer remained the focus of much research into the disease during 2006, a year in which malignancy of the gland was the second leading cause of cancer deaths in American men.
The American Cancer Society estimated that there were 234,460 prostate cancers diagnosed in 2006.On the other hand, death rates were down, with 27,350 men projected to die of prostate cancer in 2006, going from 10% of all cancer deaths in 2005 to 9% in 2006.

Both PSA (prostate specific antigen) testing and improvement in treatment are given credit for the decline in mortality, although even that is in dispute. Although PSA testing appeared helpful in monitoring treatment, studies of watchful waiting in localized disease versus active intervention in containing overall mortality have been conflicting, adding to the long-running debate about the risks and benefits of screening.

The American Cancer Society and the American Urological Association have recommended screening for prostate cancer in men over 50, whereas the American College of Physicians has suggested discussing its benefits and risks, and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has found insufficient evidence to recommend screening.

The following summary reviews some of the highlights of the year in prostate cancer research. For fuller accounts, links to the individual articles published in MedPage Today have been provided.

PSA Screening

In response to the guidelines of the various groups, Yale’s John Concato, M.D., put it simply, saying that screening almost always increases detection of disease. However, his team’s retrospective case-control study of 71,661 veterans at 10 VA hospitals in Connecticut found that screening did not appear to decrease mortality. Of the men who died of prostate cancer, 14% were screened with PSA, compared with 13% of the men in the control group. Furthermore, PSA screening did not affect all-cause mortality.

PSA Screening Has No Effect on Mortality
In a somewhat stark but realistic report, researchers at the University of California San Francisco found that older men with limited life expectancy are being screened much too often, given the potential harm that may follow a positive test versus the likelihood of benefit in the next 10 years.

In a cohort study of 59,642 U.S. veterans, 70 and older, many non-clinical factors, such as marital status and region of the country, had a greater effect on PSA screening than health.

Some physicians may be uncomfortable incorporating life expectancy into screening, a discomfort partly driven by fear of malpractice liability. However screening elderly men in poor health is not considered a standard of care, UCSF’s Louise Walter, M.D., said.

PSA Screening Rates for Elderly Men Found Too High
Not unexpectedly, obesity turned out to distort PSA results, and to be an obstruction in biopsy with an increased likelihood of yielding a false negative. Regardless of race, obese men had lower PSAs than normal-weight men. As a result, an obese man with a slightly elevated PSA might be at greater risk for prostate cancer than a man with a similar PSA and a normal BMI, Jay Fowke, Ph.D., of Vanderbilt found in a study.

Furthermore, when it comes to biopsy, because obese men tend to have larger prostates, biopsy may be more likely to miss a tumor, Duke researchers reported.

Obesity May Mask Prostate Cancer Risk by Lowering PSA Levels
Obesity May Shroud Prostate Cancer
Taking a closer look at PSA levels themselves, Johns Hopkins researchers advised that the velocity, or the rate of PSA change, not the absolute level, is the key to determining who has a life-threatening malignancy. Typically, a PSA level of 4.0 ng/mL determines who needs treatment and who doesn’t. But the rate at which the hormone level changes is a better guide and can be evaluated years before a cancer is diagnosed, they reported.

PSA Velocity Predicts Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
Watchful Waiting

Data from the National Cancer Institute’s SEER registries (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) showed that more than half of 24,405 men with low-risk prostate cancer who were candidates for “watchful waiting” received aggressive treatment instead, according to University of Michigan researchers. Of the men identified as low risk, 55% had initial curative treatment, 10% had a prostatectomy, and 45% had radiation therapy.

Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Called Over-Treated Disease
Furthermore, a Johns Hopkins study found that men who postpone surgery for treatment of localized low-grade prostate tumors do not reduce their chance for curative therapy.

After adjusting for age and PSA density at the time of diagnosis, men who delayed surgery for more than two years did not increase their risk of noncurable prostate cancer compared with men who had surgery three to four months after diagnosis

Men with Localized Low-Grade Prostate Tumors Can Delay Surgery.
The Hopkins study came shortly after researchers from Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia reported at the ASCO prostate meeting that among 48,606 men, active intervention for localized prostate cancer led to better outcomes than classic watchful waiting, as defined by delaying treatment until the start of symptoms.

ASCO Prostate: Action for Localized Disease Outdoes Classic Watchful Waiting
In a December follow-up of their ASCO report, the Fox Chase investigators said that among Medicare-age men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, those treated with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy had a 31% lower risk of death during the next 12 years than men followed by watchful waiting.

Treating Older Prostate Cancer Patients Extends Survival
Treatment Decisions

A variety of factors beyond PSAs entered into treatment decisions. For example, studies found that decisions for localized disease tended to be driven more by patients’ fears and misconceptions and by whether the urologist preferred androgen deprivation, rather than by the nature of the tumor or the patient’s age.

Fear Often Overpowers Reason When Choosing Prostate Cancer Treatment
Urologist, Not Tumor, Drives Androgen Deprivation Therapy
In still another study, an analysis of peer-reviewed articles focusing on the decision-making process for localized prostate cancer found that urologists nearly always indicated that surgery is the optimal treatment, while radiation oncologists chose their own specialty.

Specialists Offer Biased Treatment Advice for Prostate Cancer
Turning to actual treatment news, trying to compare some of the reports is like dealing with apples and oranges.

A large meta-analysis of 4,373 patients found that progression-free survival was prolonged by 10% in men with locally advanced prostate cancer who received both radiation and hormone therapy, according to Italian researchers at the Elena Cancer Institute in Rome.

ESMO: Radiation Plus Hormone Therapy is Prostate Cancer Plus
Brachytherapy

For early prostate cancer, however, a single-institution study found that brachytherapy was as effective as external-beam radiation. Researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston compared 132 men treated with high-dose brachytherapy with 132 controls given high-dose external-beam radiation and found no difference in the rate of biochemical failure, as determined by a reproducible rise in PSA level.

ASCO Prostate: Brachytherapy as Effective as External-Beam Radiation in Early Disease
Hormonal Therapy

Two years of androgen deprivation therapy reduced the risk of progression for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer, according to researchers at the Fox Chase Cancer Center.

Men given hormone therapy for two years after radiation and hormone therapy had a disease-specific survival (the good news), but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups for overall survival (the bad news). However, a study at the Cleveland Clinic suggested possible untoward results from hormone therapy longer than six months, including a two-fold increased risk of death and an increased risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

ASTRO: Hormone therapy in Prostate Cancer Shows Good News and Bad.
Health Food and Vitamins

Finally, in the never-ending annals of cancer and nutrition, pomegranate juice, which may help stabilize PSA levels, had its day in the headlines, a finding not unnoticed by supermarkets, health-food stores, and upscale chefs.

According to a study a the University of California Los Angeles, drinking a glass of the anti-oxidant-rich juice each day increased PSA doubling time from 15 months to 54 months, certainly a boon to older patients.

Pomegranate Juice Each Day Makes PSA Levels Stay
In other good news (at least for smokers), vitamin E supplements cut the prostate cancer risk for smokers by 71% and beta-carotene supplements reduced the risk for men with low baseline plasma levels of the antioxidant. The disappointing finding, however, was that neither antioxidant showed a benefit in the general population.

Vitamin E Reduces Prostate Cancer Risk in Smokers
Finally, translating positive findings from heart disease to cancer remained frustrating. For example, Rand Health researchers found that eating fish rich in omega-3 fatty acids turned out to be ineffectual for cancer in general, despite the benefits it seems to have in warding off heart disease.

Omega-3 Flounders as Cancer Protection
Cholesterol

More contradictory results included the finding that men who self-reported high levels of cholesterol had about a 50% increased risk for prostate cancer, and if they were older than 65, the risk climbed to 80%, according to researchers in Italy. This finding, if borne out by additional research, might please statin makers.

High Cholesterol May Be Prostate Cancer Risk
However, a meta-analysis of 26 trials by University of Connecticut investigators concluded that statins do not prevent cancer.

Several highly publicized retrospective studies found that statins had a dramatic effect on several malignancies, including prostate cancer, but according to the researchers, these studies could not demonstrate causality. Analysis, found that the overall incidence of cancer was not reduced among participants using statins compared with control groups.

Meta-Analysis Rules Out Statin Cancer Prevention
Prevention

Finally, Texas researchers reported that Proscar (finasteride) increased PSA sensitivity for both overall and high-grade prostate cancer but did not cause any extra aggressive malignancies, according to an analysis of more than 9,000 men.

Proscar Exonerated as Trigger for High-Grade Prostate Cancer

——————————————————————————–
Disclaimer
The information presented in this activity is that of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, MedPage Today, and the commercial supporter. Specific medicines discussed in this activity may not yet be approved by the FDA for the use as indicated by the writer or reviewer. Before prescribing any medication, we advise you to review the complete prescribing information, including indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and adverse effects. Specific patient care decisions are the responsibility of the healthcare professional caring for the patient. Please review our Terms of Use.

© 2004-2006 MedPage Today, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 27th, 2006 at 9:23 am and is filed under News Items. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.